Thursday 17 January 2013

Why the latest PS4 and Xbox 720 rumours are wide of the mark


There have been a lot of rumours over the past couple of days about the hardware that's going to be used inside the PS4 and  Xbox 720, and the brilliant Lee Bradley pointed me towards the two sets of figures that are causing plenty of debate.

VG247 is reporting that the PS4 will have 1.84 Teraflops of computing power thanks to an AMD A10-based APU, and that the next Xbox will have 1.23 Teraflops of grunt thanks to an AMD Radeon HD 8770 graphics chip.

NowGamer reckons the next PlayStation will have "an APU with a fast GPU" that'll have 3.2 Teraflops of power, but the Xbox will outstrip it with 4.2 Teraflops delivered by three System On Chip units working together.

VG247's story sounds plausible, but NowGamer's is wide of the mark. Here's why.

PS4


It's long been rumoured that the PS4 will be built on an APU, and it's easy to see why Sony wants to go down this route. AMD's APUs, or Accellerated Processing Units, combine a processor and a graphics core onto the same chip, and I've previously praised them for offering reasonable application power and good gaming ability at low cost.

AMD's current top-end APU is the A10-5800K, which includes a Radeon HD 7660D GPU. The graphics core uses the same naming convention as AMD's current discrete cards, but it's based on the architecture behind the older Radeon HD 6900-series. The HD 7660D has 614.4 Gigaflops of power, while the whole chip has 736 Gigaflops.

That's a country mile behind the 3.2 Teraflop figure that's doing the rounds.

AMD has announced the successor to the A10-5800K, so it's plausible that Sony might use hardware based on the A10-6800K in its next console. The new part's GPU will apparently be based on the forthcoming Radeon HD 8000-series graphics cards.

Bear in mind that the HD 7660D GPU was based on the HD 6900-series, and then look at this chart: several high-end 8000-series GPUs, apparently designed for OEMs, bear the Tahiti codename, which debuted in the HD 7970 and HD 7950. It's hardly a stretch to see AMD recycling last year's discrete graphics cards into this year's APUs.

Plenty more evidence suggests the 3.2 Teraflop figure simply isn't anywhere close to reality. If true, it'd put the PS4's graphics core smack between the outputs of the recently-leaked Radeon HD 8870 and 8850. However, those two cards have TDPs - Thermal Design Power, or the maximum power draw of a chip - of 160W and 130W on their own. That figure doesn't take into account the power needed by the processor, and reports have said that the A10-6800K as a whole will have a TDP of just 100W - the same as the A10-5800K.

AMD has traditionally cut down its GPUs in order to fit them inside APUs. The HD 7660D inside the A10-5800K may have been based on 6900-series cards, but it included just 384 stream processors. Even the most modest of those discrete chips, the Radeon HD 6930, included 1,280 stream processors and had a 186W TDP. The HD 6970 had 1,536 and a 250W TDP.

There's no way an APU could contain a graphics core of that power while also packing in a processing module too: the power requirements don't add up, and the heat generated would be too much for a console to bear. There's a reason discrete cards, with more than 1,000 stream processors, are sometimes nearly a foot long, while the 384-stream processor APU can be contained in a single die alongside a CPU.

Another major concern is cost. The A10-5800K launched at £100, and there's no reason for AMD to deviate from this blueprint for the A10-6800K - low cost is one of an APU's big advantages. To find a discrete AMD card that launches for that price, you've got to go a long way down the range. The HD 7850 cost £190 new, the HD 7870 was £275, the HD 7950 was £340 and the HD 7970 was £432. Even now, they're not much cheaper: around £150, £200, £250 and £320 respectively.

Sony might price the PS4 highly for the console market, but that level of GPU is way out of its league. Sony would be able to buy the cores for cheaper than retail prices, sure, but it's also got to factor in the rest of the APU, memory, storage, a motherboard, a Blu-ray drive and a high-end case - as well as its profit margin.

Conventional desktop PCs that use the A10-5800K rarely cost less than £400, so it makes sense that Sony - saving money using its own manufacturing facilities as well as its buying power - would build its next console around one of these more modest parts. Last year's APUs are good enough for console-level gaming; I've no doubt that next year's APUs would get the job done, too.

It's arguable that producing the world's best APU and giving Sony exclusivity would be an awful economic move for AMD - a company that's not having the best of times when it comes to finances. And it's not as if Sony's got the cash to buy AMD's exclusivity, either.

After all, why should customers buy any of its forthcoming discrete GPUs if Sony is selling an entire console that's just as quick for little more than the card alone would cost, and how would customers react if its best APU wasn't available to build inside PCs?

AMD's hardware partners would be up in arms about it, too - they'd presumably want to stuff the chip inside laptops and desktop machines. Its graphics card partners would want to know why AMD was ruining their sales for the sake of a console, too.

Xbox 720


The 4.2 Teraflop figure for the Xbox 720 is similarly silly. NowGamer says the next Microsoft console will be based on three SOC modules, with one based on the Radeon HD 8850 GPU and two using HD 8900-series cores.

Even downclocked, the combined power could be enough to hit that mythical 4.2 Teraflop figure, but I still don't reckon it's plausible - again because of heat and cost.

These high-end cards are traditionally some of the largest around, and leaked information suggests that 8900-series OEM parts will have TDPs of more than 200W, with the HD 8850 coming in at 130W. NowGamer's article reckons that Microsoft's cut-down cores will see the machine having a 300W power brick, which trumps the 175W brick included with the Xbox 360.

If these rumours are true, that's one power-hungry console. And then there's the price: last year's HD 7950 cost £340 when new and, while there's no way Microsoft would pay that for each GPU, consider that it's allegedly putting three graphics cores into its next console. Then consider the cost of every other component, and Microsoft's slice of profit margin.

That would make the Xbox 720 one of the most expensive and power-hungry consoles ever made and, given the hardware that's allegedly being used, it'd be one of the biggest and loudest ever, too. Considering the Xbox 360's reputation, I'm not sure that's what Microsoft wants to do.

Are any rumours right?


VG247's figures might be less exciting, but they're far more realistic. It's hardly a stretch to imagine the PS4 using a modified A10-6800K APU and, again, it's reasonable to speculate that the GPU inside will be a tweaked version of an HD 7900-series core. The discrete chips in that range run at between 2.8 and 3.7 Teraflops, so a low-power version running at 1.8 Teraflops - in order to fit inside one chip, and to remain cool inside a console - makes more sense.

It's also worth remembering that consoles use processing power more efficiently than PCs, so clever coding will make up the shortfall between theoretical power and actual visual output.

VG247 says the next Xbox is based on the Radeon HD 8770, which is a forthcoming mid-range part. No power figures have leaked for this chip but the corresponding part in last year's range, the HD 7770, hit between 1.2 Teraflops and 1.4 Teraflops, and it had a reasonable TDP of 80W.

Microsoft can take the HD 8770 and cut it down to size to hit its rumoured 1.23 Teraflop figure, which is a move that seems sensible. The HD 7770 has enough power to play most games at 1080p already, and the HD 8770 will be better still. Why do more?

End-game


It's easy to get caught up in speculation when talking about new consoles, but it's worth tempering rumours with a healthy dose of reality. AMD cramming a graphics core that's faster than its best discrete cards into an APU that's cheap enough, frugal enough and cool enough to run inside a console is a flight of fancy.

Similarly for Microsoft: producing three SOC products, each with its own high-end GPU, makes little sense when an extremely capable single graphics core would do the job just as well and for a lot less cash.

25 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Nicholas said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nicholas said...

Lame post. It assumes that Sony is just gonna slap an off-the-shelf APU into their PS4 when that's been confirmed over and over to not be the case. AMD's other hardware partners might be pissed at first to not have similar stuff available to them, but when they're informed of the actual bill of materials for PS4-like performance and told that they have to do the R&D into creating a similar custom rig themselves they'll put two and two together and realize that it's implausible to expect PS4 performance out of a standard off-the-shelf APU.

The PS4's performance has been officially confirmed in a proper specs sheet, by the way. They didn't give all that much detail, but they did confirm performance at about the level of a 7970m GPU and 8GB of GDDR5 RAM and I fully expect the PS4 to cost no more than $400 at launch. I'm fine with that.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I'm gone to tell my little brother, that he should also pay a quick visit this weblog on regular basis to obtain updated from latest gossip.

Feel free to visit my blog post :: Family Portraits Cape Town

Anonymous said...

We are a bunch of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our
community. Your web site offered us with useful info to work on.
You've done an impressive job and our entire group shall be thankful to you.

My blog post :: property development

Anonymous said...

This design is steller! You most certainly
know how to keep a reader amused. Between your
wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog
(well, almost...HaHa!) Fantastic job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that,
how you presented it. Too cool!

Here is my site: ppe Johannesburg

Anonymous said...

Hi there Dear, are you truly visiting this website
regularly, if so afterward you will without doubt obtain fastidious knowledge.


Visit my blog architectectural designs

Anonymous said...

PS4 1.8TFLOPS

Wikipedia:
GTS450 0.6 (year2010)
GTX660 1.8
GTX680 3.0
TITAN 4.5
Triple SLI TITAN ...

next 8 years hardware
GPU PS4 - no comment
CPU Jaguar core - NO COMMENT!

Anonymous said...

Greetings! I've been reading your site for a while now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Kingwood Texas! Just wanted to say keep up the fantastic work!

my webpage ford ranger forum

Anonymous said...

Good day! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering
if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form?
I'm using the same blog platform as yours and I'm having difficulty finding one?
Thanks a lot!

Feel free to surf to my web site :: click this site

Anonymous said...

Good day! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?
I'm trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I'm not seeing very
good results. If you know of any please share.
Cheers!

my site ... Click here

Anonymous said...

I don't know if it's just me or if everybody else encountering issues with your website.
It appears as if some of the written text within
your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them too?
This might be a problem with my browser because I've had this happen before. Many thanks

Feel free to surf to my blog post Visit here

Anonymous said...

hey there and thank you for your info – I have definitely picked up
something new from right here. I did however expertise some technical points using
this web site, since I experienced to reload the website lots of times previous to
I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK?
Not that I'm complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and could damage your quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you update this again soon.

Take a look at my weblog ... visit here

Anonymous said...

I'm extremely inspired together with your writing talents as well as with the structure to your weblog. Is this a paid subject or did you customize it your self? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it's rare to
see a great blog like this one these days..

Here is my website: visit this site

Anonymous said...

Hi to every body, it's my first go to see of this website; this web site contains remarkable and actually good stuff in favor of readers.

Also visit my blog: Click here

Anonymous said...

That, plus the added benefits and customization abilities that come with your own wordpress
blog for example, makes the paid option a no-brainer for anyone that can afford it.

If you are getting an internet business off the ground, or you have
been in the game for a while, but don't understand why you can't get a good response from your
clients or prospective clients, than you already know that
communication is one of the most important currencies around when it comes to doing businesses
online. My call to travel with Word Press and not with one among the other big blogging entities like Blogger, had the whole lot to try
to to with my possessing whole control over the web site.


my homepage; WP Social Press

Anonymous said...

Good article. I will be dealing with some of these issues
as well..

My page ... Louis Vuitton Bags Outlet

Anonymous said...

I used to be suggested this web site by means of my cousin.
I am not sure whether this submit is written by means of
him as nobody else know such special about my difficulty.
You're wonderful! Thanks!

My webpage Christian Louboutin Sale

Anonymous said...

I every time used to read article in news papers but
now as I am a user of web so from now I am using net for content, thanks to web.


my weblog - Tory Burch Flats

Anonymous said...

I could see this tool being especially popular with libraries that, dexter missouri topic
in order to study the effects of the surgery medication is uncontrollable shaking.
The intersections coming from Wolf Nursery Road to the Loop, Frey at the Loop, the 4
way stop at Wal-Mart, the 4 way stop at Dale Street will
all be massively impacted. Beyond the big companies dexter missouri topic has
a lot of factors.

My weblog - zachariah hedrick

Anonymous said...

hello!,I really like your writing so much! percentage we keep up a correspondence
extra approximately your post on AOL? I require an expert on this house to resolve my problem.
May be that is you! Having a look forward to see you.


Review my site; Michael Kors Outlet

Anonymous said...

smokeless cigarettes, e cigarette, smokeless cigarettes, electronic cigarette, electronic cigarette starter kit, e cigarette health